Streaming’s live-TV bundles aren’t actually saving cord-cutters money compared to cable

The big promise of streaming’s new live-TV packages was simple: you could get most of your favorite channels for less than the cost of cable. It’s what drove millions of Americans to consider cutting the cord, as they say, and trade their old cable-TV packages for shiny, new streaming alternatives like SlingTV and YouTube TV.

Research suggests that, nearly three years after the first virtual pay-TV provider, SlingTV, arrived, these packages aren’t actually saving people money.

In 2016, swapping a traditional pay-TV package from a cable provider like Comcast or Charter for a virtual pay-TV subscription through an online provider like SlingTV knocked about $20 off the average US customer’s cable bill, found M Science, a research firm that tracks consumer transaction data. The savings by November 2017, which also included new live-TV packages from providers like DirecTV Now, Hulu and YouTube TV, was around $16.

When paired with the cost customers continued to pay their cable providers for things like internet, phone, or additional TV packages, the savings vanished altogether. The average virtual pay-TV subscriber paid about $15 more in aggregate than the average cable customer in 2017, based on M Science’s data.

That’s in part because customers can often get a better deal bundling two or three services from a cable provider, like TV, internet, and home phone service, than paying for internet alone. It’s marketed by cable operators as the double or triple play. “The cable companies will incentivize aggressively for bundling and penalize for unbundling,” said Corey Barrett, senior analyst for technology, media, and telecom at M Science. “They’ll have attractive rates for a double-play bundle and if you decide to go to broadband only, it’s going to cost more than broadband bundled with other services.”

Some customers also boost their broadband speeds when they switch over to streaming alternatives to support the higher usage. That adds to the bill, too.

SlingTV customers saw the smallest increase in spending compared to cable alone, with a lift of about $5 last year. The service’s basic plan is cheaper than rivals DirecTV Now and Hulu, but also has fewer channels. Some people may also choose to spend more to customize their channel lineups on a package like SlingTV, add premium channels like HBO onto DirecTV Now, or buy features like extra DVR storage on Hulu.

Saving money isn’t the only reason people choose online live-TV providers over regular cable. The idea of being able to customize packages and only pay for channels and services you want is attractive to customers after decades of being forced into bundles with hundreds of channels they never watch. These virtual pay-TV providers allow you to login and watch from almost any screen, anywhere, rather than being tethered to a living room set-top box. And some, like Hulu’s live-TV offering, have other compelling value propositions like the inclusion of Hulu’s robust on-demand library.

Read next: US TV subscribers are ditching cable and satellite faster than ever

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why China sees Myanmar's Rohingya crisis as an opportunity

Image
Thomson Reuters Myanmar's government has been embroiled in battle of rhetoric over its alleged ethnic cleansing of Rohingya Muslims, but unlike the west, China sees an opportunity amid the affair. For China, Myanmar's crisis is a gateway for it to pursue similar economic and infrastructure strategies it has undertaken in Africa in order to extend its geopolitical reach. Myanmar is part of a complex geopolitical maze in which China is but one player. As the Myanmar government's violent policy towards its Rohingya Muslims drew increasing international condemnation in 2016, the country's sometime icon of democracy, Aung San Suu Kyi,   declined to speak out   for the persecuted minority. And in her attempts to protect Myanmar from renewed isolation, she has continued to deepen its relationship with her most powerful authoritarian neighbour: China. It seems the common notion that newly democratic states have little time for autocratic partners is false. Before the W...
Read more

Losing my faith in philanthropy led me to rediscover its power to change the world for good

Image
On Christmas Eve 2012, I was seriously considering quitting my job at the Gates Foundation. As I confessed to my wife, Emily, while wrapping presents, “I no longer believe in philanthropy.” I’d been at the foundation since the early days, rising from an entry-level analyst to R&D Lead for Maternal and Child Health, where I led the launch of the Grand Challenges Explorations program and published a number of articles in top journals like Science and The Lancet. By all professional measures I was “outperforming,” as we would describe successful grants. After one annual review, Bill Gates remarked at the high-degree of “actionable information” in my portfolio. Yet, despite the praise, there I was disillusioned and disconsolate. My doubts went beyond the usual critiques of rich-country philanthropists imposing foreign values or scientists pursuing unrealistic pipe dreams. My questions were more fundamental and vexing. Am I changing the world for the better? Or am I deceiving myself...
Read more

The 10 safest countries in the world for women

Image
Leanna Garfield/Business Insider New World Wealth consultancy has carried out an analysis on the safest countries in the world for women.  They claim there is a correlation of 92% between historic wealth growth and the safety levels of women. Australia ranked as the safest country in the world for women.  It was followed by Malta and Iceland, but the  UK didn't make the top 10. Australia is the world's safest country for a woman, according to analysis by consultancy New World Wealth in its 2018 Global Wealth Migration Review. The report mainly looks at the movement of high net worth individuals (HNWI) across the world. However, part of that analysis involves reviewing the safest countries for women. "Woman safety is one of the best ways to gauge a country's long term wealth growth potential, with a correlation of 92% between historic wealth growth and woman safety levels," the report says. "This means that wealth growth is boosted by strong leve...
Read more